Abstract

This study focuses on the automatic detection of human actions in video streams. The requirement to detect what human activities happen in videos is recognition of human action due to significant differences in people's visual and motion appearance and actions, camera perspective shifts, moving background, occlusions, noise, and a massive amount of video data. The human activity recognition challenge involves identifying physical activities carried out by individuals or groups based on traces of movements, including gestures, actions, interactions, and group activities. The detection of concepts usually requires additional annotations for the training dataset. In this paper, useful methods for categorizing human action recognition are discussed. The current models are an accurate deep learning method that is based on models that have been changed to be more useful. The large disparities that result from the backdrop and the size of the objects have prevented the identification of activities in videos from being fully and effectively addressed. The main objective is to achieve better accuracy for the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) method, which was used to improve the Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) model. In this paper, LSTM is used to come up with models for different action recognition tasks. The model was made better by making the LSTM have four layers and putting 128 units, 64 units, 32 units, and 16 units in each layer, respectively. In addition, the performance evaluation of deep learning-based approaches has been compared to other related works. Therefore, an improved approach to RNN is proposed to recognize human actions. To classify the videos, a multilayer RNN with a specific type of LSTM is used to extract features from video sequences. The UCF-101 and UCF Sports human action recognition datasets are utilized in this study for both training and assessment. Test findings demonstrate that the suggested strategy achieved increased accuracy. Finally, the enhanced RNN model's total model accuracy in the UCF-101 dataset is 93.78% and 95.70% for the UCF Sport dataset.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.