Abstract

Relative radiometric normalization (RRN) of remotely sensed images is often a preprocessing step during time series analysis and change detection. Conventional RRN methods may lessen the radiation difference of changed pixels in images during the RRN process, thus reducing the accuracy of change detection. To solve this problem, we propose a relative radiometric correction method based on wavelet transform and iteratively reweighted multivariate alteration detection (IR-MAD). A wavelet transform is applied to separate high and low frequency components of both the target image and reference image. The high frequency components remain unprocessed to preserve high frequency information. We use the IR-MAD algorithm to normalize the low frequency component of the target image. A reverse wavelet transform reconstructs the radiometrically normalized image. We tested the proposed method with traditional histogram matching, mean variance, the original IR-MAD method, and a method combining wavelet transform and low-pass filtering, and change detection was conducted to evaluate the RRN quality. The experiments show that the proposed method can not only effectively eliminate the overall radiation difference between images but also enable higher accuracy of change detection.

Highlights

  • Divergences in the reflectance of remote sensing images for an area can indicate land cover change

  • To overcome the limitations of existing methods, we propose a relative radiometric normalization method based on wavelet transform and iteratively reweighted multivariate alteration detection (IR-multivariate alteration detection (MAD)) (WIRMAD)

  • We propose an radiometric normalization (RRN) method based on wavelet transform and the image regression (IR)-MAD algorithm

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Divergences in the reflectance of remote sensing images for an area can indicate land cover change. In practical remote sensing applications, radiometric normalization is conducted to eliminate the radiometric discrepancy between images caused by acquisition conditions rather than actual changes in ground objects.[7,8]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call