Abstract
This article shows that re-normalizing the interpolation kernel for a constant integral can make a significant improvement in performance of sinc interpolation methods. A comparison was performed between standard and re-normalized sinc kernels of various sizes using data from four commonly used magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences. Standard rotations were performed and compared with a "gold standard" data set generated by use of a large (13 x 13 x 13) sinc kernel. Measurements of systematic pixel intensity offset error and variance of generated residuals were used to estimate resultant interpolation error. Theoretical estimates of the consequent savings in computation time were compared with the measured time required for each algorithm and with the automated image registration (AIR) program. The use of a small (5 x 5 x 5) re-normalized kernel produced relative errors comparable to those in the gold standard data set, allowing saving in computation time of up to 30 times in comparison with standard sinc interpolation. This approach brings the implementation of MR volume re-slicing much closer to the demands of a clinical environment. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999;10:582-588.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
