Abstract

BackgroundGenomic selection is increasingly widely practised, particularly in dairy cattle. However, the accuracy of current predictions using GBLUP (genomic best linear unbiased prediction) decays rapidly across generations, and also as selection candidates become less related to the reference population. This is likely caused by the effects of causative mutations being dispersed across many SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) that span large genomic intervals. In this paper, we hypothesise that the use of a nonlinear method (BayesR), combined with a multi-breed (Holstein/Jersey) reference population will map causative mutations with more precision than GBLUP and this, in turn, will increase the accuracy of genomic predictions for selection candidates that are less related to the reference animals.ResultsBayesR improved the across-breed prediction accuracy for Australian Red dairy cattle for five milk yield and composition traits by an average of 7% over the GBLUP approach (Australian Red animals were not included in the reference population). Using the multi-breed reference population with BayesR improved accuracy of prediction in Australian Red cattle by 2 – 5% compared to using BayesR with a single breed reference population. Inclusion of 8478 Holstein and 3917 Jersey cows in the reference population improved accuracy of predictions for these breeds by 4 and 5%. However, predictions for Holstein and Jersey cattle were similar using within-breed and multi-breed reference populations. We propose that the improvement in across-breed prediction achieved by BayesR with the multi-breed reference population is due to more precise mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL), which was demonstrated for several regions. New candidate genes with functional links to milk synthesis were identified using differential gene expression in the mammary gland.ConclusionsQTL detection and genomic prediction are usually considered independently but persistence of genomic prediction accuracies across breeds requires accurate estimation of QTL effects. We show that accuracy of across-breed genomic predictions was higher with BayesR than with GBLUP and that BayesR mapped QTL more precisely. Further improvements of across-breed accuracy of genomic predictions and QTL mapping could be achieved by increasing the size of the reference population, including more breeds, and possibly by exploiting pleiotropic effects to improve mapping efficiency for QTL with small effects.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12711-014-0074-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Genomic selection is increasingly widely practised, in dairy cattle

  • These results suggest that the linkage disequilibrium (LD) between markers and quantitative trait loci (QTL) was different in the validation population compared to the reference or training population

  • The variance captured by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was equal to about 70% of the genetic variance for production traits (FY, milk yield (MY), protein yield (PY), F%, P%) and about 90% for STAT and FERT

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The accuracy of current predictions using GBLUP (genomic best linear unbiased prediction) decays rapidly across generations, and as selection candidates become less related to the reference population. This is likely caused by the effects of causative mutations being dispersed across many SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) that span large genomic intervals. Saatchi et al [2] reported a decline in accuracy of genomic predictions that were derived from a US Hereford population when they were tested in Canadian, Uruguayan or Argentinean Hereford populations These results suggest that the linkage disequilibrium (LD) between markers and quantitative trait loci (QTL) was different in the validation population compared to the reference or training population. Acrossbreed prediction is challenging because, in addition to the possible occurrence of inconsistent LD between markers and QTL [5,6], QTL may be breedspecific, which places an upper limit to the accuracy that can be reached in another breed

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.