Improved outcomes associated with stenting in the healthcare cost and utilization project.

Abstract

Recent results from Medicare indicated that both hospital mortality and the use of same admission coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery were lower in patients receiving stents, and that stenting did not alter the finding of improved outcomes at high volume centers. The purpose of this report is to compare outcomes in a national sample of patients of all ages receiving stents with those undergoing conventional balloon angioplasty. A second purpose is to evaluate the volume outcome hypothesis. This study included 100,318 angioplasties from 191 hospitals in 19 states; 43,966 (44%) involved stent placement. The major outcomes of interest were same admission hospital death and same admission CABG surgery. In comparison to patients with conventional angioplasty, patients receiving stents were younger, less often female and nonwhite, and had less diabetes and hypertension. In the group without infarction, hospital mortality was lower in the stent group (0.7% vs 0.9%, P = 0.01), as was the use of same admission bypass surgery (1.4% vs 2.7%, P < 0.0001). The same pattern was true for myocardial infarction; hospital mortality (2.7% vs 4.2%, P < 0.0001) and bypass surgery rates (1.6% vs 5.3%, P < 0.0001) were lower in the stent group. These results persisted after adjustment for important predictors of outcome. In general, outcomes were better in high volume centers, although in the stent group, there was no clear relationship between volume and outcome. These results support earlier findings that hospital mortality and particularly same admission surgery rates are lower with stenting. Although the volume outcome association for stenting was less clear in this study than in Medicare, these results do not mean that the fundamental volume outcome relationship has been changed by stenting.