Abstract

BackgroundTreatment outcomes of octogenarians with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), are often considered poor. With ongoing advancements and experience in endovascular technology, we sought to evaluate the outcomes of octogenarians treated for aSAH in the second post-ISAT/BRAT trial decade. MethodA single-center database of aSAH was reviewed to identify patients aged 80 or above undergoing aneurysm treatment. Mortality and favorable neurological outcome (defined as mRS <3) were assessed among the series and compared across several subgroups. ResultsOctogenarian patients constituted 6% of the aSAH cohort (38/619) over the reviewed period. Twenty-one percent were high grade (Hunt-Hess IV-V). Endovascular treatment was the first-line modality in 90% of patients. During a median follow-up of 17 months, the overall mortality was 39%. Higher mortality was associated with poor Hunt-Hess grade (100% for Grade-V, 47% for III-IV, 13% for I-II, P=0.004) and non-independent baseline function status (100% mortality for non-independent vs. 28% for independent group, P=0.002). At last follow-up, 53% of patients achieved a favorable neurological outcome. The stratified rate was 80% in Hunt-Hess grade I-II and over 60% in patients with premorbid independent function status or less than 5 frailty components (P≤0.02 vs. poorer counterparts). ConclusionNeurological outcomes of octogenarian patients with aSAH are improving in the second post-trial decade, particularly given the preponderance of endovascular treatment. Baseline functional status and comorbidities of octogenarians should be considered in addition to the Hunt-Hess grade in prognostication.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.