Abstract

The surface finish quality of a machined workpiece is commonly measured using the average roughness parameter, Ra. This parameter, however, is insensitive to the lateral changes undergone by the surface in the feed direction as a consequence of tool wear. In this work, the effectiveness of four methods of workpiece surface analysis, namely autocorrelation, cross-correlation, and two new methods, called lateral material shift (LMS) ratio and profile slope ratio (PSR) analyses are investigated. Dry machining experiments were carried out on 316 stainless steel. Images of tool nose and workpiece profiles were captured using digital camera, and the edges were extracted using sub-pixel edge detection. In the autocorrelation approach, each workpiece profile was correlated with a shifted version of the same profile. In the cross-correlation approach, the workpiece profiles at different stages of machining were correlated with a reference profile generated using the unworn tool edge. In the LMS ratio method, the material shift ratios were determined from each waveform on the workpiece profile at various stages of tool wear, while in the PSR method the slopes at the right and left part of the waveform were compared. Among the four methods, the LMS ratio method produced the best correlation with tool flank wear with the maximum R-squared value of 0.9461, while average roughness Ra showed no correlation at all with both major and nose flank wear.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.