Abstract

One of the major limitations of evolutionary algorithms based on the Lebesgue measure for multi-objective optimization is the computational cost required to approximate the Pareto front of a problem. Nonetheless, the Pareto compliance property of the Lebesgue measure makes it one of the most investigated indicators in the design of indicator-based evolutionary algorithms (IBEAs). The main deficiency of IBEAs that use the Lebesgue measure is their computational cost which increases with the number of objectives of the problem. On this matter, the investigation presented in this paper introduces an evolutionary algorithm based on the Lebesgue measure to deal with box-constrained continuous multi-objective optimization problems. The proposed algorithm implicitly uses the regularity property of continuous multi-objective optimization problems that has suggested effectiveness when solving continuous problems with rough Pareto sets. On the other hand, the survival selection mechanism considers the local property of the Lebesgue measure, thus reducing the computational time in our algorithmic approach. The emerging indicator-based evolutionary algorithm is examined and compared versus three state-of-the-art multi-objective evolutionary algorithms based on the Lebesgue measure. In addition, we validate its performance on a set of artificial test problems with various characteristics, including multimodality, separability, and various Pareto front forms, incorporating concavity, convexity, and discontinuity. For a more exhaustive study, the proposed algorithm is evaluated in three real-world applications having four, five, and seven objective functions whose properties are unknown. We show the high competitiveness of our proposed approach, which, in many cases, improved the state-of-the-art indicator-based evolutionary algorithms on the multi-objective problems adopted in our investigation.

Highlights

  • In several engineering and sciences applications, some problems require the simultaneous optimization of a number of objective functions

  • evolutionary multi-objective algorithms (EMOAs) based on indicators—the topic investigated in this work—explicitly optimize a quality indicator (e.g., R2 [3], Lebesgue measure [4], indicator [5], IGD [6], among others) to approximate the Pareto front of a multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs)

  • After these results, regarding the Hn and IGD+ quality indicators, we can say that Lebesgue indicator-based evolutionary algorithm (LIBEA)-II performs slightly better on the UF test problems than SMS-EMOA, iSMS-EMOA, and LIBEA, since, despite solutions from LIBEA-II, have comparable hypervolumes, they are closer to the P F in more benchmark functions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In several engineering and sciences applications, some problems require the simultaneous optimization of a number of objective functions. This paper introduces an improved Lebesgue indicator-based evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization. Analogous to LIBEA, the proposed algorithm addresses the notion of IBEA [7] in the sense of optimizing a quality indicator It is directed at maximizing the Lebesgue measure of non-dominated solutions obtained through the search. 2. General Background This section provides the foundations of multi-objective optimization, introduces the indicator-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, and presents some concepts related to performance quality indicators. Indicator-Based Evolutionary Algorithms for Multi-Objective Optimization Quality indicators have been introduced to compare the outcomes of multi-objective algorithms in a quantitative manner They map a Pareto front approximation to a scalar number that quantifies the performance of a multi-objective approach. A comprehensive review of these types of algorithms can be found in [27]

Hypervolume Performance Indicator
Normalized Hypervolume Indicator
Previous Related Work
Framework of the Improved Lebesgue Indicator-Based Evolutionary Algorithm
Recombination Mechanism
Survival Selection Mechanism
IBEAs Considered for Comparison of Performance
Adopted Test Problems
Experimental Settings
F CR Pm ηm T δ ρc ρn SMS-EMOA
Analysis of Results on the UF Test Problems
Three Real-World Applications from Practice
RWA1: Liquid-rocket single element injector design
RWA2: Ultra-wideband antenna design
RWA3: Development of oil and water repellent fabric
Experimental Setup
Analysis of Results
Analysis of the Conflict Relation Between Pairs of Objectives
Objectives
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call