Abstract

Abstract. Global Ozone Monitoring by Occultation of Stars (GOMOS) on board Envisat has performed about 440 000 nighttime occultations during 2002–2012. Self-calibrating measurement principle, good vertical resolution, excellent pointing accuracy, and the wide vertical range from the troposphere up to the lower thermosphere make GOMOS profiles interesting for different analyses. The GOMOS ozone data are of high quality in the stratosphere and the mesosphere, but the current operational retrieval algorithm (IPF v6) is not optimized for retrievals in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS). In particular, validation of GOMOS profiles against ozonesonde data has revealed a substantial positive bias (up to 100 %) in the UTLS region. The retrievals in the UTLS are challenging because of low signal-to-noise ratio and the presence of clouds. In this work, we discuss the reasons for the systematic uncertainties in the UTLS with the IPF v6 algorithm or its modifications based on simultaneous retrievals of several constituents using the full visible wavelength range. The main reason is high sensitivity of the UTLS retrieval algorithms to an assumed aerosol extinction model. We have developed a new ozone profile inversion algorithm for GOMOS data (ALGOM2s version 1.0), which is optimized in the UTLS and uses IPF v6 advantages in the middle atmosphere. The ozone retrievals in the whole altitude range from the troposphere to the lower thermosphere are performed in two steps, as in the operational algorithm: spectral inversion followed by the vertical inversion. The spectral inversion is enhanced by using a DOAS-type method at visible wavelengths for the UTLS region. This method uses minimal assumptions about the atmospheric profiles. The vertical inversion is performed as in IPF v6 with the Tikhonov-type regularization according to the target resolution. The validation of new retrieved ozone profiles with ozonesondes shows a dramatic reduction of GOMOS ozone biases in the UTLS. The new GOMOS ozone profiles are also in a very good agreement with measurements by MIPAS, ACE-FTS, and OSIRIS satellite instruments in the UTLS. It is also shown that the known geophysical phenomena in the UTLS ozone are well reproduced with the new GOMOS data.

Highlights

  • Monitoring ozone concentration in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS) is important, because the processes occurring in this region can strongly affect surface climate (Gettelman et al, 2011)

  • We have developed a new ozone profile inversion algorithm for Global Ozone Monitoring by Occultation of Stars (GOMOS) data (ALGOM2s version 1.0), which is optimized in the UTLS and uses IPF v6 advantages in the middle atmosphere

  • The presented comparison of GOMOS ozone profiles with ozonesonde data, together with other analyses overviewed in the introduction, shows a consistent picture: GOMOS V6 ozone is overestimated in a large part of the UTLS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Monitoring ozone concentration in the UTLS (upper troposphere–lower stratosphere) is important, because the processes occurring in this region can strongly affect surface climate (Gettelman et al, 2011). Horizontal column density of ozone, NO2, NO3, and aerosol extinction are retrieved simultaneously from UV–VIS spectrometer data in the wavelength range 250–675 nm, for each tangent altitude (Kyrölä et al, 2010). For GOMOS ozone profiles processed with IPF v5, van Gijsel et al (2010) have performed an analysis analogous to Meijer et al (2004) but on a significantly larger dataset and found large GOMOS positive bias, over 40 %, in the tropical UTLS and below This conclusion is in full agreement with the validation work of Mze et al (2010) using ozone soundings from eight SHADOZ stations.

Data and methodology
Validation results and discussion
Identification of reasons for GOMOS V6 ozone biases in the UTLS
Triplet inversion in the UTLS
60 Dilution
Combining V6 and triplet horizontal column densities
Examples of individual retrievals
Validation and intercomparison of the new retrievals: focus on the UTLS
Some geophysical illustrations in the UTLS using the ALGOM2s data
Findings
Summary and discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.