Abstract

Clavicle fractures are common orthopedic injuries that occur in a young active population and are even more common in the military. Military fitness test data presents the unique opportunity to analyze functional ability with regard to military-specific activities. The primary goal of this study was to compare functional outcomes using military fitness test data between operative and non-operative treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. We performed a retrospective review of active-duty U.S. Navy and Marine patients with midshaft clavicle fractures treated at our institution over a seven-year period. There were 94 and 153 patients in our operative and non-operative cohorts, respectively. Average follow-up time from the date of injury or surgery was 28 months.The rate of infection in the operative group (4%) was significantly greater than in the non-operative group (0%, p = 0.023). The rate of non-union in the operative group (3%) was significantly lower than in the non-operative group (14.5%, p = 0.004). The rate of symptomatic malunion in the operative group (0%) was significantly different from that in the non-operative group (4.6%, p = 0.036). There was no significant difference in the rate of revision surgery between the operative (9.2%) and non-operative (13.2%) groups (p = 0.105).A total of 51 marines met inclusion criteria for our functional outcome analysis using Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test (PFT) data. Of those who underwent operative fixation, 68% were able to meet or surpass their pre-injury average amount of pull-ups in their first PFT after surgery and 88% by the next PFT at least one year after surgery. While 69% of non-operative patients met their pre-injury average in their first PFT, only 57% maintained this level at least one year after surgery. This difference was statistically significant.In our functional outcome subgroup analysis, we found improved outcomes for pull-ups at least one year out when midshaft clavicle fractures are treated operatively compared to non-operatively. While similar findings in the literature are based on functional outcome questionnaires, physical fitness performance data has not been reported on to our knowledge.

Highlights

  • Clavicle fractures are common orthopedic injuries that occur in a young active population and account for 2.6% of all fractures [1]

  • The rate of infection in the operative group (4%) was significantly greater than in the non-operative group (0%, p = 0.023)

  • The rate of symptomatic malunion in the operative group (0%) was significantly different from that in the non-operative group (4.6%, p = 0.036)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Clavicle fractures are common orthopedic injuries that occur in a young active population and account for 2.6% of all fractures [1]. More recent studies, including level one clinical trials, have supported surgical management of clavicle fractures to decrease nonunion and symptomatic malunion rates [5,6]. Fixation of those fractures that have radiographic characteristics of complete displacement, shortening, and comminution has been proposed. While the functional outcomes of operatively versus non-operatively treated injuries have been traditionally considered similar, there is recent data to suggest improved functional scores in surgically treated patients This data has consisted of improved shoulder endurance as well as improved Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores in operatively treated injuries [12].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call