Abstract
We inserted, in 8 dogs, implants with either porous-coated or grit-blasted titanium surface and coated with hydroxyapatite (HA) into trabecular bone in the proximal humerus, using a 1 mm gap model. After 25 weeks, push-out tests showed that energy absorption for porous-coated implants was twice that of grit-blasted implants, whereas shear stiffness was reduced by one fifth, indicating a stronger fixation of porous-coated implants. Macroscopically, all grit-blasted implants had delamination of the HA coating, whereas porous implants failed mostly at the HA-tissue interface. Porous-coated implants had 47% bone ingrowth and grit-blasted implants 70% (p = 0.02), however, no difference in absolute surface area was found. Part of the HA coating was resorbed during the implantation period as regards volume and thickness. HA coverage was more reduced on porous-coated than on grit-blasted implants (p = 0.01). No foreign-body reaction or osteolysis was seen. An important finding was that one fifth of the surface with complete resorption of HA coating was replaced by newly formed bone.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
