Abstract

Calibration and correction methods for the Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) are based on the fundamental assumption of the constant error model, which is independent of connected calibration standards and/or devices under test (DUT). Unfortunately, this assumption is not satisfied well for planar calibration standards fabricated by etching technology on soft substrates. An evaluation of the error model is affected especially by variations in the manufacturing process and also by the reproducibility of an assembly. In this paper, we propose error minimization by selecting the best combination of available calibration standards based on time domain reflection (TDR) measurement, which can also be obtained by the fourier transformation from the measured S-parameters. The proposed method was verified experimentally using short, open, load and thru (SOLT) standards fabricated on an FR4 laminate substrate which achieves the essential reduction of the measurement error in the frequency range up to 15 GHz.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe accuracy of the error model is increased by using a CAD-based evaluation of the calibration standards [1] and statistical processing of measured data of an over-determined set of calibration standards [2]-[5]

  • Many papers on improving Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) calibration procedure have been published recently

  • The connectors are either soldered to the printed circuit board (PCB) or they just touch the strip when a text fixture is used

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The accuracy of the error model is increased by using a CAD-based evaluation of the calibration standards [1] and statistical processing of measured data of an over-determined set of calibration standards [2]-[5] Another improved calibration procedure optimizes parameterized models of calibration standards to minimize nonreciprocity in a known asymmetrical reciprocal two-port device [6]. These techniques increase the accuracy of the measured S-parameters while maintaining the requirements on the hardware quality of the calibration standards at the same level. An origin of errors is explained assuming the SOLT calibration and correction method

Error sources
Variation of the manufacturing process
Reproducibility of the assembly
Uncertainty of calibration standards
TDR preselection
Calibration scheme
Experiment
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.