Abstract
Detection of a lupus anticoagulant (LA) is of major importance to detect a thrombotic tendency. Confirmation of its phospholipid dependency may represent a tricky step in the diagnostic algorithm for LA, as several tests may yield borderline results of little diagnostic help. To improve on this point, we had previously employed a procedure comparing sensitive [rabbit brain kaolin (RBK)] and insensitive [soy bean phosphatides (SBP)] reagents to LA to screen and confirm LA at the same time in activated partial thromboplastin systems (aPTT). Here we compared its performance against a platelet neutralization procedure (PNP). To allow comparisons of our procedures with the PNP, a percentage ratio correction was calculated according to the following formula: [(RBK ratio - SBP ratio) x 100]/ RBK ratio. Similarly for the PNP: percentage ratio correction = [(buffer ratio - platelet phospholipid ratio) x 100]/buffer ratio. On 44 known LA plasmas, the PNP, expressed in seconds, yielded 15 (34%) negative or borderline results. After ratio transformation, the PNP still yielded 10 of 15 (66%) uncertain results, whereas the RBK/SBP procedure did not give any uncertain results (P = 0.0002). The mean percentage ratio correction was far superior for the RBK/SBP procedure than for the PNP (53.24 +/- 15.93 versus 20.28 +/- 12.15%, P < 0.0001). The use of sensitive and insensitive reagents to the lupus anticoagulant increases the confirmatory yield of LA in aPTT systems and may deserve inclusion amongst the confirmatory procedures for its diagnosis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.