Abstract
This study evaluated the compressibility of multislice CT (MSCT) datasets and its dependence on (1) slice thickness and (2) the use of three-dimensional (3D) vs. 2D JPEG2000 compression methods. Five thoracic CT datasets were obtained using a 16-detector MSCT scanner with a collimation of 0.75 mm (120 kVp, 90 mAs) and reconstructed at five slice thicknesses from 0.75 to 10.0 mm. These datasets were irreversibly compressed using a standard 2D JPEG2000 encoder and a developmental 3D JPEG2000 algorithm based on Part 2 of the JPEG2000 standard. Compression ratios ranged from 4:1 to 64:1. Image distortion was computed utilizing peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and the Sarnoff JNDmetrix visual discrimination model. For 2D compression, the thinnest sections were substantially less compressible than thicker sections for the same level of image quality, particularly at higher compression ratios. Applying 3D compression yielded consistently higher image quality in most cases compared to 2D compression at the same ratios. The advantage of 3D compression increased for thinner slices and higher compression ratios. These results indicate that 3D JPEG2000 (Part 2) compression offers substantial advantages over the current 2D JPEG2000 standard, yielding better quantitative image quality at similar compression ratios or comparable image quality at higher compression ratios.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.