Abstract
[Ramsey's Theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramsey%27s_theorem) is one of the most prominent results in graph theory. In its simplest form, it asserts that every sufficiently large two-edge-colored complete graph contains a large monochromatic complete subgraph. This theorem has been generalized to a plethora of statements asserting that every sufficiently large structure of a given kind contains a large "tame" substructure. The article concerns a closely related problem: for a structure with a given property, find a substructure possessing an even stronger property. For example, what is the largest $K_3$-free induced subgraph of an $n$-vertex $K_4$-free graph? The answer to this question is approximately $n^{1/2}$. The lower bound is easy. If a given graph has a vertex of degree at least $n^{1/2}$, then its neighbors induce a $K_3$-free subgraph with at least $n^{1/2}$ vertices. Otherwise, a greedy procedure yields an independent set of size almost $n^{1/2}$. The argument generalizes to $K_s$-free induced subgraphs of $K_{s+1}$-free graphs. Dudek, Retter and Rödl provided a construction showing that the exponent $1/2$ cannot be improved and asked whether the same is the case for $K_s$-free induced subgraphs of $K_{s+2}$-free graphs. The authors answer this question by providing a construction of $K_{s+2}$-free $n$-vertex graphs with no $K_s$-free induced subgraph with $n^{\alpha_s}$ vertices with $\alpha_s<1/2$ for every $s\ge 3$. Their arguments extend to the case of $K_t$-free graphs with no large $K_s$-free induced subgraph for $s+2\le t\le 2s-1$ and $s\ge 3$.
Highlights
Let G be a graph with n vertices that contains no K4
Each vertex in G has a triangle-free neighbourhood, and either there is a vertex of degree n1/2 or one can find an independent set of size roughly n1/2 by repeatedly choosing vertices and discarding their neighbours
The problem above is an example of a general problem that was first considered by Erdos and Rogers
Summary
Let G be a graph with n vertices that contains no K4. How large a triangle-free induced subgraph must G have? The standard proof of Ramsey’s theorem implies that G contains an independent set of size n1/3, but can we do better?. The first bounds were obtained by Erdos and Rogers [7] who showed that for every s there exists a positive constant ε(s) such that fs,s+1(n) ≤ n1−ε(s). The lower bound was significantly improved by Sudakov [11, 12] He showed that if t > s + 1, fs,t(n) ≥ Ω(nas,t ) where as,t is defined recursively. Dudek, Retter and Rödl [3], generalizing Wolfovitz’s construction, showed that for any s ≥ 3 there exist constants c1 and c2 such that fs,s+1(n) ≤ c1n1/2(log n)c2 so the exponent 1/2 is correct for all fs,s+1.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.