Abstract

We present a new analysis of the ratio epsilon'/epsilon within the Standard Model (SM) using a formalism that is manifestly independent of the values of leading (V-A)x(V-A) QCD penguin, and EW penguin hadronic matrix elements of the operators Q_4, Q_9, and Q_10, and applies to the SM as well as extensions with the same operator structure. It is valid under the assumption that the SM exactly describes the data on CP-conserving K -> pi pi amplitudes. As a result of this and the high precision now available for CKM and quark mass parameters, to high accuracy epsilon'/epsilon depends only on two non-perturbative parameters, B_6^(1/2) and B_8^(3/2), and perturbatively calculable Wilson coefficients. Within the SM, we are separately able to determine the hadronic matrix element <Q_4>_0 from CP-conserving data, significantly more precisely than presently possible with lattice QCD. Employing B_6^(1/2) = 0.57+-0.19 and B_8^(3/2) = 0.76+-0.05, extracted from recent results by the RBC-UKQCD collaboration, we obtain epsilon'/epsilon = (1.9+-4.5) 10^-4, substantially more precise than the recent RBC-UKQCD prediction and 2.9 sigma below the experimental value (16.6+-2.3) 10^-4, with the error being fully dominated by that on B_6^(1/2). Even discarding lattice input completely, but employing the recently obtained bound B_6^(1/2) <= B_8^(3/2) <= 1 from the large-N approach, the SM value is found more than 2 sigma below the experimental value. At B_6^(1/2) = B_8^(3/2) = 1, varying all other parameters within one sigma, we find epsilon'/epsilon = (8.6+-3.2) 10^-4. We present a detailed anatomy of the various SM uncertainties, including all sub-leading hadronic matrix elements, briefly commenting on the possibility of underestimated SM contributions as well as on the impact of our results on new physics models.

Highlights

  • A long-standing challenge in making predictions for ε /ε within the Standard Model (SM) and its extensions has been the strong interplay of QCD penguin contributions and electroweak penguin contributions to this ratio

  • We present a new analysis of the ratio ε /ε within the Standard Model (SM) using a formalism that is manifestly independent of the values of leading (V − A) ⊗ (V − A) QCD penguin, and EW penguin hadronic matrix elements of the operators Q4, Q9, and Q10, and applies to the SM as well as extensions with the same operator structure

  • We employed a formalism that is manifestly independent of the values of leading (V − A) ⊗ (V − A) QCD penguin, and EW penguin hadronic matrix elements of the operators Q4, Q9, and Q10

Read more

Summary

Basic formulae

As present calculations by lattice QCD and in [24] are not precise enough, at this moment, we cannot exclude that B6(1/2) could be as large as B8(3/2) and this leads conservatively to the bound in (1.4) For these reasons it is instructive to consider other values of the parameters B6(1/2) and B8(3/2) than those obtained by RBC-UKQCD collaboration which are, consistent with the large-N bound in (1.4). This is an important result as it shows that even if the value of B6(1/2) from lattice calculations would move up in the future, the SM would face difficulty in reproducing the data provided the large-N bound in (1.4) is respected With these results at hand, we are in the position to summarise the present picture of the estimate of ε /ε in the SM:.

Comparison with RBC-UKQCD lattice QCD
Contribution of Q4 and ReA0
Electroweak contribution
Missing chromomagnetic contributions
Missing low-energy contributions
Findings
Missing higher-order corrections to the Wilson coefficients
Summary and outlook
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call