Abstract

Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) in 5G has many advantages; however, one of the disadvantages is that the superposition of a large number of subcarriers leads to a high peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of the transmit signal. A high PAPR results in high-power amplifier distortion and performance degradation. The partial transmit sequence (PTS) algorithm is commonly used for PAPR reduction. It enumerates all combinations of phase factors, weighs the signal using each phase factor combination, and finds the set of phase factors that minimizes the PAPR value of the OFDM signal. The advantage of the PTS is that it determines the optimal solution through enumeration; however, its major drawback is the higher complexity caused by the use of enumeration. Some studies have introduced the discrete particle swarm optimization (DPSO) algorithm instead of enumeration to determine the optimal solution of the PTS algorithm. As an excellent optimization method, the DPSO algorithm represents each individual as a solution during the optimization. Through iterative updates of the initial population, individuals in the population continuously move closer to the optimal solution. This approach significantly reduces complexity compared with the exhaustive enumeration used in the traditional PTS algorithm. However, the disadvantage of the general DPSO algorithm is that it can result in premature and early convergence, which leads to degradation of the PAPR reduction performance. In this study, we propose an improved method based on the general DPSO-based PTS algorithm, and the improved algorithm MDPSO-PTS adopts dynamic time-varying learning factors, which can find the optimal combination of phase factors more efficiently. The MDPSO-PTS algorithm expands the search space when seeking the optimal combination of phase factors. This avoids the drawback of premature convergence commonly observed in general DPSO-PTS algorithms, preventing early consideration of local optima as global optima. A comparative simulation of the improved MDPSO-PTS algorithm with the general DPSO-PTS algorithm shows that the improved algorithm has stronger PAPR reduction, whereas the complexity remains basically unchanged. A comparative simulation with the traditional PTS algorithm shows a significant reduction in complexity, with only a slight, acceptable loss of reduction performance.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call