Abstract

The accuracy of airfoil polar predictions is limited by the usage of imperfect turbulence models. Can machine-learning improve this situation? Will airfoil polars teach the effect of turbulence on skin-friction? We try to answer these questions by refining turbulence treatment in the Rfoil code: boundary layer closure relations are learned from airfoil polar data. Two turbulent closure relations, for skin friction and energy shape factor, are parametrized with a class-shape transformation. An experimental database is then used to define code inaccuracy measures that are minimized with an interior point gradient algorithm. Results show that airfoil polars contain exploitable information about turbulent phenomena. Inferred closures agree with direct numerical simulation results of skin friction and the new code predicts drag more accurately. Maximum lift remains under-predicted but Rfoil maintains its robustness and suitability for optimization of wind energy airfoils.

Highlights

  • Wind turbine airfoils operate in high Reynolds flows with intricate eddies that cannot be resolved in practical simulations

  • Flow solvers model the effect of unresolved turbulent phenomena by combining mechanistic insight with closure relations

  • While the boundary-layer partial-differential-equations (BL-PDE) (1) are closed, system (2) comprises two ordinary differential equations (ODEs) that depend on five variables

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wind turbine airfoils operate in high Reynolds flows with intricate eddies that cannot be resolved in practical simulations. Flow solvers model the effect of unresolved turbulent phenomena by combining mechanistic insight with closure relations. Closures inject empirical knowledge into simulations and dominate errors in airfoil predictions [1,2,3] – be it for Viscous-Inviscid (VII) [4,5], Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) [6], Large-Eddy (LES) [7] or Lattice-Boltzman [8] environments. That is why we use experimental airfoil polars to learn new turbulent closure relations for the. Results comprise a tailored Rfoil code and closure relations for turbulent skin friction (Cf ) and energy shape factor (H∗). The boundary-layer (BL) flow is solved with an integral method based on the Von Karman equations [41, 43]:

H32 Cf θ2 θ Ue
Laminar and turbulent closure relations
Inaccuracy measure
Parametric closure relations
Results and Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.