Improved Activity and Durability of Carbon-Coated Pd and PdNi Anode Catalysts in AEMFC

Abstract

Anion exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFC) have received growing attention due to the strategic potential of using low content (or absence) of PGM catalysts in the electrodes.[1] Completely PGM-free cathode catalysts are well established in those conditions,[2] while the anode ones remain critical in terms of the beginning-of-life activity and long-term performance.[3] The widely Pt- and Pd-based catalysts degrade mainly by nanoparticles detachment and agglomeration in alkaline conditions.[4] These degradations may be slowed down by wrapping the nanoparticles in some carbon layers (called carbon-coated), that prevent also metal oxidation and leaching into the electrolyte in the RDE setup.[5] However, the performance in AEMFC of carbon-coated nanoparticle catalysts is still unclear.Here, two groups (previously characterized in RDE, XRD, IL-TEM, XPS and ICP-MS techniques[5]) of carbon-coated catalysts were investigated in 5 cm2 AEMFC: monometallic Pd (Pd@C/C) and bimetallic PdNi (PdNi@C/C) nanoparticles supported on carbon, and compared them to unprotected ones (Pd/C and PdNi/C). The four different anode catalysts were compared for a fixed Pd anode loading of 0.27 mgPd cm-2, and were combined with a ZIF-8 derived Fe-N-C cathode catalyst (previously developed Fe0.5-NH3). The Pd@C/C and PdNi@C/C reached superior initial performances (700 and 1300 mA cm-2) than the Pd/C and PdNi/C references (300 and 390 mA cm-2) at 0.6 V and Tcell = 60 °C. This translates into an initial activity trend of PdNi@C/C > PdNi/C > Pd@C/C > Pd/C. After 12 h durability test at a cell voltage of 0.3 V, the AEMFC with the PdNi@C/C based anode exhibits a dramatically higher retention of performance (95%) than the cells with Pd/C (55%) and PdNi/C (70%) anodes. These results evidence the robustness of bimetallic carbon-coated nanoparticle catalysts for AEMFC anodes. Figure 1