Abstract
Imported malaria is an increasing problem in many countries. The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the diagnosis and treatment of imported malaria cases identified by active surveillance. Microscopic diagnosis at the community level was also compared to reference microscopic and blinded molecular diagnostic methods. Most travelers who acquire malaria had sought pretravel advice from a physician; however, only 11% used recommended chemoprophylaxis and only 17% used insect protection measures. The diagnosis of malaria was initially missed in 59% of cases. Community-based microscopic diagnosis provided incorrect species identification in 64% of cases. After presentation, the average delay before treatment was 7.6 days for falciparum malaria and 5.1 days for vivax malaria. Overall, 7.5% of Plasmodium falciparum-infected patients developed severe malaria, and in 11% of all cases therapy failed. Patients who present to a center without expertise in tropical medicine receive suboptimal treatment. Improvements in recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of malaria are essential to prevent morbidity and death among travelers.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
