Abstract

Mold-based fungal infections have become increasingly important over several decades, paradoxically because advances in medical practice have allowed patients with chronic medical conditions to live longer and have lives that are more productive. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis can affect those individuals with an atopic predisposition. Use of direct antimold antifungal agents can decrease the number of steroid treatment courses and monoclonal antibody therapy used in these patients. Pulmonary invasive aspergillosis remains the most important opportunistic mold infection among immunocompromised patients. Surrogate markers of diagnosis can include β-d-glucan or Aspergillus galactomannan antigen testing, although the specificity of both tests is not robust. There are three general classes of antifungal agents in use, with less nephrotoxic options. With safer therapeutic options, empirical treatment occurs with tremendous frequency among otherwise immunosuppressed individuals. Thus, clinicians will need to maintain a high suspicion for mold infections that can be resistant to a previously used antifungal therapy. Attention to liver function testing during long-term use of these advanced-generation azole antifungal agents, and at times therapeutic drug monitoring with blood levels, will be needed. The echinocandin class of antifungal agents does not have hepatic or renal toxicity in general, but these agents need to be administered via an intravenous route. With routine use of agents that have activity against aspergillosis, fusariosis, mucormycosis, or other mold infections become evident for a minority of at-risk patients. This review contains 5 figures, 3 tables and 90 references Key words: allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, dematiaceous fungi, Exserohilum, fusariosis, invasive aspergillosis, mucormycosis, Scedosporium

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call