Abstract

The authors, on the basis of analysis of growing motorization, particularly at the regional level (using the example of Penza region of the Russian Federation) confirm the urgency of the tasks of preserving life and health of road users, note changes in frequency of accidents of various origin, the positive role of insurance instruments in dealing with the consequences of road traffic accidents.At the same time, fraud in the field of compulsory motor third party liability insurance (MTPL) is one of the most important and urgent issues for insurance companies. One of the most common schemes of fictitious accidents is an attempt to get repair or replacement of existing damage at the expense of the insurer. In this regard, the use of transport trace evidence examinations has become widespread.It is this type of transport expertise that reliably and accurately determines conformity of damage to vehicles to the mechanism and circumstances of a road traffic accident. Trace evidence analysis is always assigned when it comes to currently notorious «staged crash». It is impossible to understand the nature of accidents associated with lane change by vehicles moving along the way without study of trace materials. Particularly many problems arise in a situation where both participants in the accident claim that they were moving without changing the direction of movement, and that was the opponent who made a maneuver of lane change not complying with the requirement of the road traffic rules of the Russian Federation on priorities in traffic movement.As an example, the article presents an expert study of a road traffic accident that raised doubts about reliability of circumstances set out by policyholders.

Highlights

  • Ильина Ирина Евгеньевна –Пензенский государственный университет архитектуры и строительства (ПГУАС), Пенза, Россия

  • При этом двери автомобиля BMW по расположению криминальный подтекст причин обращеотносительно поверхности дороги и меха- ния участника ДТП по поводу возмещения низму образования соответствуют повреж­ ущерба, не имеющего отношения к дандениям на левой двери и левом желобке ной аварии, не относится к задачам траавтомобиля УАЗ‐396259, расположенным сологической экспертизы

  • Но вместе с тем повреж­дения на переднем бампере (включая молдинг), переднем правом крыле, заднем бампере автомобиля BMW не образуют пары взаимно контактирующих поверхностей с автомобилем УАЗ‐396259, что позволяет сделать вывод о том, что данные повреж­дения не могли образоваться при исследуемом ДТП

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ильина Ирина Евгеньевна –Пензенский государственный университет архитектуры и строительства (ПГУАС), Пенза, Россия. Поврежд­ ения на ручке передней правой нии спереди назад (при положении колеса, двери расположены на высоте 81÷84 см от когда зона повреждений находится сверху).

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.