Abstract

Souring is the unwanted formation of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) by sulfate-reducing microorganisms (SRM) in sewer systems and seawater flooded oil reservoirs. Nitrate treatment (NT) is one of the major methods to alleviate souring: The mechanism of souring remediation by NT is stimulation of nitrate reducing microorganisms (NRM) that depending on the nitrate reduction pathway can outcompete SRM for common electron donors, or oxidize sulfide to sulfate. However, some nitrate reduction pathways may challenge the efficacy of NT. Therefore, a precise understanding of souring rate, nitrate reduction rate and pathways is crucial for efficient souring management. Here, we investigate the necessity of incorporating two thermodynamic dependent kinetic parameters, namely, the growth yield (Y), and FT, a parameter related to the minimum catabolic energy production required by cells to utilize a given catabolic reaction. We first show that depending on physiochemical conditions, Y and FT for SRM change significantly in the range of [0-0.4] mole biomass per mole electron donor and [0.0006-0.5], respectively, suggesting that these parameters should not be considered constant and that it is important to couple souring models with thermodynamic models. Then, we highlight this further by showing an experimental dataset that can be modeled very well by considering variable FT. Next, we show that nitrate based lithotrophic sulfide oxidation to sulfate (lNRM3) is the dominant nitrate reduction pathway. Then, arguing that thermodynamics would suggest that S° consumption should proceed faster than S0 production, we infer that the reason for frequently observed S0 accumulation is its low solubility. Last, we suggest that nitrate based souring treatment will suffer less from S0 accumulation if we (i) act early, (ii) increase temperature and (iii) supplement stoichiometrically sufficient nitrate.

Highlights

  • Biologic hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production due to the activity of sulfate reducing microorganisms (SRM), or the so-called souring pro­ cess, is a common problem in sewer systems (Jiang et al, 2014) and secondary oil recovery by seawater flooding (Veshareh and Ayatollahi, 2019) due to the odorant, corrosive and toxic nature of H2S

  • Nitrate can suppress souring by various mechanisms such as activating orga­ notrophic nitrate-reducing microorganisms that may outcom­ pete SRM for the available organic matter (Agrawal et al, 2012), and reducing sulfide concentration by stimulating lithotrophic nitrate-reducing microorganisms (Veshareh et al, 2021)

  • Growth yield can be used to link the differences in energetics of microbial reactions with their kinetics for metabolisms that have a sufficiently high -ΔGcat such that thermodynamic limiting factor is equal to one

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biologic hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production due to the activity of sulfate reducing microorganisms (SRM), or the so-called souring pro­ cess, is a common problem in sewer systems (Jiang et al, 2014) and secondary oil recovery by seawater flooding (Veshareh and Ayatollahi, 2019) due to the odorant, corrosive and toxic nature of H2S. Nitrate treatment (NT) is one of the intervention methods to control souring by stimulating nitrate reducing microorganisms (An et al, 2010). Nitrate can suppress souring by various mechanisms such as activating orga­ notrophic nitrate-reducing microorganisms (oNRM) that may outcom­ pete SRM for the available organic matter (Agrawal et al, 2012), and reducing sulfide concentration by stimulating lithotrophic nitrate-reducing microorganisms (lNRM) (Veshareh et al, 2021). An understanding of likely nitrate reduction pathways as well as kinetics of sulfate and nitrate reduction is essential for designing promising NT plans

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call