Abstract

IntroductionEndometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological malignancy in developed countries. Early and accurate diagnostic assessment is crucial for appropriate treatment planning. Information obtained by pre-operative imaging with transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and histological endometrial biopsy assessment is often the cornerstone for further management planning. This study aimed to analyse the accuracy of this diagnostic approach for patient management decisions. Materials and methodsThis single-centre retrospective analysis included all patients with endometrial cancer treated between 2015 and 2019. Pre-operative TVUS staging assessment and histopathological endometrial biopsy examination were compared with the final surgical stage and histopathological diagnosis. ResultsPre-operative and surgical pathological assessment of Type I and Type II tumours was in agreement in 95 % (174/184) and 54 % (12/22) of cases, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of TVUS assessment of myometrial invasion were 76 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 66.3–84.2 %] and 81.7 % [95 % CI 73.0–88.6 %], respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was higher for Type I EC (95 %) than Type II EC (54 %). Only presumed ESMO/ESGO/ESTRO risk classification (p < 0.000) and deep myometrial invasion (p < 0.000) were significant for the prediction of lymph node involvement. ConclusionPre-operative TVUS examination and pathological endometrial biopsy evaluation enable moderately accurate assessment of the risk of EC. Efforts should be aimed towards the development of novel and more reproducible methods, such as molecular tumour characterization, to improve the pre-operative assessment of risk in patients with EC.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call