Abstract

BackgroundWhile most guidelines advocate D2 lymphadenectomy for non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (nmGaC), it is not always performed as standard of care outside East Asia. The recommended minimal examined lymph node (ELN) count in nmGaC to stage cancer accurately varies largely across guidelines, and the optimal count to satisfactorily stratify patient survival has yet to be determined. This large cohort study aimed at robustly defining the minimal and optimal thresholds of examined lymph node (ELN) number in non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (nmGaC).MethodsData on nmGaC patients operated in 2010–2016 and surviving ≥3 months were retrieved from the US SEER-18 Program and a Chinese multi-institutional gastric cancer database (MIGC). The correlation of ELN count with stage migration and patient survival were quantified with the use of the multivariable-adjusted logistic and proportional hazards Cox models, respectively. The sequences of odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) for each additional ELN were smoothed, and the structural breakpoints were determined.ResultsTogether 7,228 patients from the US and 1,468 from China were analyzed, encompassing 23,114 person-years of follow-up. The mean ELN count was 20 in the US and 30 in China. With more ELNs, both cohorts significantly showed proportional increases from lower to higher nodal stage (ORSEER = 1.03, 95%-CI = 1.03–1.04; ORMIGC = 1.02, 95%-CI = 1.02–1.03) and sequential enhancements in postoperative survival (HRSEER = 0.97, 95%-CI = 0.97–0.97; HRMIGC = 0.98, 95%-CI = 0.97–0.99). Correlations for both stage migration and survival were still significant in most subgroups by patient, cancer, and management factors. Breakpoint analyses revealed a minimum threshold ELN count of 17 and an optimum count of 33, which were validated in both cohorts with good efficacy to differentiate probabilities of both stage migration and survival.ConclusionIn resected nmGaC patients with anticipated survival ≥3 months, more ELNs are correlated with more accurate staging, which may partly explain the survival correlation. This observational investigation does not indicate causality. Our findings robustly conclude 17 ELNs as the minimum and propose 33 ELNs as the optimum thresholds, to assess the quality of lymph node examination and to stratify postsurgical survival.

Highlights

  • While most guidelines advocate D2 lymphadenectomy for non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma, it is not always performed as standard of care outside East Asia

  • To enable a reliable claim of node-negative disease, 17 examined lymph node (ELN) were further chosen as the minimum threshold on the basis of the odds ratios (ORs) for negative-to-positive nodal stage migration in the US (Table 4), which was validated in a way similar to that for the optimum threshold in both overall and stratified analyses

  • In our large observational study, multivariable-adjusted stage migration analyses of resected non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (nmGaC) patients from the US and China revealed that more ELNs were associated with more positive LN (PLN)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

While most guidelines advocate D2 lymphadenectomy for non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (nmGaC), it is not always performed as standard of care outside East Asia. The recommended minimal examined lymph node (ELN) count in nmGaC to stage cancer accurately varies largely across guidelines, and the optimal count to satisfactorily stratify patient survival has yet to be determined. This large cohort study aimed at robustly defining the minimal and optimal thresholds of examined lymph node (ELN) number in non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (nmGaC). Resection with adequate lymphadenectomy is still the cornerstone of potential cure for most medically fit patients with non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (nmGaC) [2]. Postsurgical radiotherapy may further enhance survival especially for disease with more advanced nodal stage or after a limited lymphadenectomy, while it has limited survival impact on nodenegative disease [10,11,12]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call