Importance of crop varieties and management practices: evaluation of a process-based model for simulating CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O fluxes at five European maize (&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Zea mays&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; L.) sites

L Li,W Jans,N Vuichard,T Gruenwald,N Viovy,P Ciais,C Bernhofer,P Béziat,S Lehuger,T Wang,M Wattenbach,E Ceschia

doi:10.5194/bg-8-1721-2011

Abstract

Abstract. This paper is a modelling study of crop management impacts on carbon and water fluxes at a range of European sites. The model is a crop growth model (STICS) coupled with a process-based land surface model (ORCHIDEE). The data are online eddy-covariance observations of CO2 and H2O fluxes at five European maize cultivation sites. The results show that the ORCHIDEE-STICS model explains up to 75 % of the observed daily net CO2 ecosystem exchange (NEE) variance, and up to 79 % of the latent heat flux (LE) variance at five sites. The model is better able to reproduce gross primary production (GPP) variations than terrestrial ecosystem respiration (TER) variations. We conclude that structural deficiencies in the model parameterizations of leaf area index (LAI) and TER are the main sources of error in simulating CO2 and H2O fluxes. A number of sensitivity tests, with variable crop variety, nitrogen fertilization, irrigation, and planting date, indicate that any of these management factors is able to change NEE by more than 15 %, but that the response of NEE to management parameters is highly site-dependent. Changes in management parameters are found to impact not only the daily values of NEE and LE, but also the cumulative yearly values. In addition, LE is shown to be less sensitive to management parameters than NEE. Multi-site model evaluations, coupled with sensitivity analysis to management parameters, thus provide important information about model errors, which helps to improve the simulation of CO2 and H2O fluxes across European croplands.

Highlights

The global carbon budget has significantly changed due to various human activities
The objectives of this paper are: (1) to evaluate the performance of the ORCHIDEE-STICS land surface model in modelling CO2, H2O fluxes and biometric variables over croplands at five maize sites in Europe; and (2) to quantify the uncertainties caused by different management parameters, in order to estimate their impacts on large scale integration studies
E4v.oluEtivonolouf t5i-odnaysosfmo5o-tdheadyNs EsEm(loefot)thaneddLEN(ErigEht)(ldeufrtin)gathnedgrLowEing(rpiegrhiotd) simulated and the measured leaf area index (LAI) during the late period can974 datuthreinfigvetmheaizgersoitwes.inCgircpleesryimobdolas tintdhiceatefievdedymcoaviazreianscieteosb.serCveidrcvaleluessyamndbbolules be partly explained by a hail storm (38 mm in 30 min) that975 indicate eddy covariance observed values and blue line indicates vlinaeluinedsicsaitems uvalaluteesdsibmyulaOteRd HbyICORDHEICED-SEET-ISCTISC.S.TThhee flfluuxxees saraeresmsomothoeodthoveedr caused damage to plants on 88 DAP (20 July 2007)

Summary

Introduction

The global carbon budget has significantly changed due to various human activities. Agriculture, as a main way to produce food and feed, is one of these activities. Continuous micrometeorological measurements of the net exchange of CO2, H2O and heat between various terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere have been developed worldwide using the eddy-covariance technique since the 1990’s (Baldocchi et al, 2001; Baldocchi, 2003; Valentini, 2003) These point-scale flux measurement time-series may prove difficult to scale up for quantifying regional carbon and water budgets due to spatial and temporal variations in climate, soil properties and management practices (Kucharik and Twine, 2007), promising up-scaling studies were recently published (Jung et al, 2009; Beer et al, 2010)

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion