Importance of Clean Techniques and Speciation in Assessing Water Quality for Metals

Abstract

Trace metals in aquatic and soil systems exist in a number of different soluble and particulate forms that impact the effect of the metals on these ecosystems. Appropriate methods of sampling and analysis are required to accurately determine the low concentrations present. Although assessment of metals in many regulatory programs is based on data for total metal concentrations, such values rarely correlate with effects. Consequently, other means are needed for the prediction of risk. Bioavailability of metals depends on their speciation, whose importance was first established for copper in aquatic systems where the toxicity of metals is related to the activity of the free metal ion. Small concentrations of natural organic matter strongly complex metals ameliorating toxicity. Several electroanalytical techniques are available that allow the assessment of metal species. Recently, a modeling approach, the Biotic Ligand Model (BLM), has been applied to the prediction of acute toxicity. The model accounts for the effects of natural organic matter, pH, and hardness and is able to predict toxicity over several orders of magnitude of soluble metal concentration using only easily determined site parameters. Total metal concentrations in sediment cover several orders of magnitude with no distinction of sediments that cause effects and those that do not except at low total metal concentrations. Relating the metal concentration to the concentrations of sulfide and organic matter binding sites enables the sediments containing higher concentrations of metals to be divided into those that do and those that do not have adverse effects. It is essential that metal speciation be considered to realistically evaluate the potential of metals to pose risk.