Abstract
at about 0.74 and the regression weight at 0.60 (given random data), which is higher than the empirical correlation of 0.47 and regression weight 0.43. They insightfully point out that our path of 0.61 from number of extant avifauna to number of threatened avifauna is positive, as is the null hypothesis. Nevertheless, our path of 0.61 was a standardized, partial regression coefficient calculated after controlling for the effects of other variables and is not directly comparable to simple linear regression coefficients. These paths are interpreted as the proportional change in standard deviation of the dependent variable to
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
