Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the impolite complaint strategies that are used by Iranian EFL learners and native speakers in relation to social distance. This study also aimed at determining if there were significant differences among the strategies used by each group and if there was a significant difference between Iranian native speakers of English. To this end, 40 Iranian EFL learners and 20 Americans who were native speakers of English participated in this study. To make sure about the homogeneity of Iranian participants the Oxford Placement Test (OPT) was conducted. A questionnaire containing 12 different situations was designed by the researchers and was given to the participants to express their complaints for each situation. The results revealed that there were significant differences among the strategies used by each group; the most common strategy that was used by both groups of participants was positive impoliteness and the least common one was bald-on-record. Although the most and least common strategies used by both groups were the same, Iranians had a stronger tendency for using sarcasm in low social distance situations while natives had a stronger tendency for using bald-on-record in high social distance contexts. This study has implications for EFL curriculum designing in Iran and can make Iranian EFL instructors familiar with the importance of impoliteness as an indispensable part of language.

Highlights

  • 1.1 Background to the StudyImpoliteness is an insolent manner that disregards accepted social usage (Lewis, 2003)

  • This study was conducted to investigate the impolite complaint strategies that are used by Iranian EFL learners and native speakers in relation to social distance

  • Relevant statistics were used to figure out if there was a difference between Iranian EFL learners and native English speakers in using impoliteness strategies of complaint speech acts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1.1 Background to the StudyImpoliteness is an insolent manner that disregards accepted social usage (Lewis, 2003). Impoliteness is defined as “communicative strategies designed to attack face, and thereby cause social conflict and disharmony” According to Culpeper (2005), impoliteness is not (a) incidental face-threat, (b) unintentional, (c) banter, and (d) bald-on record politeness. Culpeper (1996) stated that there are different strategies for expressing impoliteness: bald-on record impoliteness, positive impoliteness, negative impoliteness, off-record impoliteness, and withhold politeness. Negative impoliteness is the use of strategies used to harm the addressee’s negative face. Off-record impoliteness happens when the face-threatening act is done by means of an implicature as one attributable intention clearly prevails over any others. Sarcasm happens when the face-threatening act is done with the use of politeness strategies that are obviously artificial and the speaker means the opposite of what is said

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call