Abstract
Recent research shows that the implied cost of capital (ICC), measured from analyst forecasts and current stock prices, predicts market returns. This paper studies the cross-section of stocks and finds that ICC negatively predicts returns. An investment strategy that goes long low-ICC stocks and short high-ICC stocks provides an alpha of 6% per year. Evidence suggests that the negative relation is due to the fact that stocks with a high level of ICC are systematically related with overly optimistic earnings forecasts. High-ICC stocks are also associated with a low probability of survival. Investors fail to incorporate this bias, leading to more negative earnings surprises. The findings highlight the need to exercise caution when using ICC as a measure of cost of capital for individual firms.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
