Abstract

There is growing appreciation for the role of long-term memory in guiding temporal preparation in speeded reaction time tasks. In experiments with variable foreperiods between a warning stimulus (S1) and a target stimulus (S2), preparation is affected by foreperiod distributions experienced in the past, long after the distribution has changed. These effects from memory can shape preparation largely implicitly, outside of participants’ awareness. Recent studies have demonstrated the associative nature of memory-guided preparation. When distinct S1s predict different foreperiods, they can trigger differential preparation accordingly. Here, we propose that memory-guided preparation allows for another key feature of learning: the ability to generalize across acquired associations and apply them to novel situations. Participants completed a variable foreperiod task where S1 was a unique image of either a face or a scene on each trial. Images of either category were paired with different distributions with predominantly shorter versus predominantly longer foreperiods. Participants displayed differential preparation to never-before seen images of either category, without being aware of the predictive nature of these categories. They continued doing so in a subsequent Transfer phase, after they had been informed that these contingencies no longer held. A novel rolling regression analysis revealed at a fine timescale how category-guided preparation gradually developed throughout the task, and that explicit information about these contingencies only briefly disrupted memory-guided preparation. These results offer new insights into temporal preparation as the product of a largely implicit process governed by associative learning from past experiences.

Highlights

  • It is a nearly universal fact of life that it is good to be prepared

  • None of our statistical inferences regarding Reaction times (RTs) were any different upon excluding these participants, and their data remained included for all analyses

  • The present study illustrates associative guidance generalizing to novel stimuli: By pairing unique photographs of faces and scenes with different FP distributions, we found that participants adjusted their temporal preparation in response to neverbefore seen photographs of either category

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is a nearly universal fact of life that it is good to be prepared. Anticipating upcoming stimuli and events involves a cognitive process that allows us to react faster and more accurately to them. MTP proposes that preparation is guided by Hebbian learning between a dynamic neural representation of time that evolves during the foreperiod (cf Howard & Eichenbaum, 2013; Machado 1997; Shankar & Howard, 2011), and motor processes that govern the inhibition and activation of prepotent responses (cf Davranche, Tandonnet, Burle, Meynier, Vidal, & Hasbroucq, 2007; Duque & Ivry, 2009; Los, 2013; Naatanen, 1971; Narayanan & Laubach, 2006) These associations are formed on individual trials as episodic memory traces. A defining assumption of instance theories is that cognitive performance is automatically and implicitly modulated by the associations

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call