Abstract

An experiment examined the potentially biasing effects of prior implicit personality theories on judgments about new empirical data related to the theory. In addition, the study examined the joint effects of prior theories and new data on final implicit personality theories. New data were presented to college student participants in scatterplot form. Results yielded strong evidence of biased assimilation in the judgments of the new data; that is, judgments of new data were systematically biased in the direction of prior implicit personality theories. However, judgments were also very sensitive to the covariation strength of new data. Finally, both prior theories and new data influenced final beliefs, providing evidence for both perseverance and change of initial beliefs. Discussion focuses on the conditions under which biased assimilation is likely to occur and on the conditions under which such biases constitute reasonable ways to deal with uncertainty.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call