Abstract

The transit technique is responsible for the majority of exoplanet discoveries to date. Characterizing these planets involves careful modeling of their transit profiles. A common technique involves expressing the transit duration using a density-like parameter, , often called the “circular density.” Most notably, the Kepler project—the largest analysis of transit light curves to date—adopted a linear prior on . Here, we show that such a prior biases measurements of impact parameter, b, due to the nonlinear relationship between and transit duration. This bias slightly favors low values (b ≲ 0.3) and strongly disfavors high values (b ≳ 0.7) unless the transit signal-to-noise ratio is sufficient to provide an independent constraint on b, a criterion that is not satisfied for the majority of Kepler planets. Planet-to-star radius ratio, r, is also biased due to r − b covariance. Consequently, the median Kepler DR25 target suffers a 1.6% systematic underestimate of r. We present a techniques for correcting these biases and for avoiding them in the first place.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call