Abstract

A common problem when casting reinforced concrete structures is to have a lower concrete compressive strength as opposed to what has been assumed in design. The deflections that may occur under the serviceability conditions can exceed the maximum allowed. Although less frequent nowadays, there is still an ongoing demand to offer simple and practical retrofitting solutions for such situations. To cast a new concrete layer above an existing waffle slab facing these problems is sometimes, only by appearance, the simplest retrofitting method. The major disadvantages reside in the growth of the overall steel consumption and overall weight of the structure. Additional reinforcement is needed for the new slab and at the interface of the two concretes. Interventions that are not always simple and accessible to the builder may still be needed to satisfy the strength demands of the already cast elements. Therefore, a post-tensioning system placed bellow the existing concrete seems to be a better solution. The present study refers to a real-case investigation on a 5-level residual building where a low concrete class was identified for several waffle slabs. Casting an overall top concrete slab or applying an exterior post-tensioning system were the two main retrofitting solutions offered by the designer. Both solutions are compared in terms of structural performance and cost efficiency.

Highlights

  • The present paper refers to a real-case investigation upon finding the proper solution for retrofitting several waffleslabs

  • The problem appeared at the construction site, where lower concrete strengths were obtained after casting the first slabs

  • Two retrofitting solutions were studied for a multi-storey building having waffle-slab floors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The present paper refers to a real-case investigation upon finding the proper solution for retrofitting several waffleslabs. Concerns coming from the builder about the whole structure being compromised started to emerge This was mainly because at the time this problem was identified, the first three floors were already built. By the time the first retrofitting solutions were proposed, a new batch of insitu cores were tested, revealing a slight raise of the compression strength. This was assumed to be caused by the ongoing curing process, mainly because the time difference between the two measurements was approximately one month, and the weather was favourable during this time (i.e. relatively high temperatures combined with normal humidity levels).

A brief description of the building
The structural system
Preliminary tests and structural expertise
Numerical analyses
Analysis of the initial state of the slabs
The top concrete layer model
The post-tensioning system model
Retrofitting solutions
The top concrete layer retrofitting solution
The post-tensioning retrofitting solution
Comparison of the proposed retrofitting solutions
Conclusions
Findings
EN 1992- 1- 1: 2004: Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part 1- 1
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call