Abstract

Despite the move to state education, policy-makers since the early 1900s have encouraged the community, external agencies, private companies, employers and voluntary organisations to become involved in schools. The rationales for these collaborations are to address issues (e.g., delinquency, neglect, underachievement and low family support), which will be tackled through activities (e.g., extra-curricular clubs and one-to-one support) and to focus on the social aspects of schooling of wider audiences (e.g., adults). These activities are deemed as beneficial through implementation which is perceived to be issue free. Research is lacking with regard to how these policy responses are played out in practice and the perceptions of those involved. This paper reveals the individuals involved in four case study schools using an audit pro-forma, documentary analysis and interviews with school staff and external agencies. The findings highlight that several individuals were expected to deliver former statutory provision for free, but quality was a concern. Individuals may perceive that their activities contribute to the national curriculum, but staff had different perceptions. This paper reveals how policies are directing the individuals involved and their activities. There are questions over whose interests are intended to be served and the implications for pupils, parents, schools, communities and politicians.

Highlights

  • Despite the shift to state responsibility for education or schooling, this paper highlights that policy-makers have continually invited the community, external agencies, private companies, employers and voluntary organisations to become involved in schools

  • Each theme includes a discussion of the related findings which have emerged and the issues, assumptions and solutions from policies which invite external agencies to collaborate with schools

  • Nigel revealed that his involvement in Thornily was a result of national funding that his service had received and he approached the school at a community meeting

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite the shift to state responsibility for education or schooling, this paper highlights that policy-makers have continually invited the community, external agencies, private companies, employers and voluntary organisations to become involved in schools. Hadow Report (Board of Education 1926) and a range of other policies discussed in this paper outline policy-makers’ concerns about pupils (e.g., behaviour, learning and wellbeing) and the perceived underlying issues (e.g., delinquency, lack of achievement or neglect). Matheson (2008) agrees that these ideologies are not mutually exclusive and a policy could advocate both traditional and child-centred methods, despite these often being expressed as a dichotomy. This suggests that there is a complexity in the purpose of policies which encourage

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.