Implications of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention on disease progression and the resulting changes to the physiology and pathology of the native coronary arteries.

Abstract

Myocardial revascularization can be achieved through 2 different methods: coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clinical trials comparing PCI and CABG generally use the composite end points of death, stroke, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization to determine superiority. Other effects of these interventions, including the preservation of normal coronary physiology, the response of the coronary tree to stressors and the response of the vessel wall to the revascularization intervention, are not routinely considered, but these may have significant implications for patients in the medium and long term. For PCI, relatively small differences in clinical outcomes have been reported between bare metal and drug-eluting stents, and the latter seems to have inconsistent and somewhat unpredictable effects on the vascular biology of the coronary arteries. In coronary bypass, the use of arterial conduits is associated with superior clinical outcomes, better long-term patency and the preservation of essentially normal coronary function after intervention. This review assembles the clinical, physiological, angiographic and pathological literature currently available and attempts to provide a more complete picture of the effects of CABG and PCI on coronary arteries.