Abstract
A Collective Agreement (CA) may have a serious impact on the supervision of family therapy. The author, using examples from structural family therapy, discusses some of the implications for such concepts as hierarchy, individuation, boundaries and subsystems. The CA agency, with greater limitations on its management rights, must clearly define its mandate for clinical supervision.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
