Abstract
A Collective Agreement (CA) may have a serious impact on the supervision of family therapy. The author, using examples from structural family therapy, discusses some of the implications for such concepts as hierarchy, individuation, boundaries and subsystems. The CA agency, with greater limitations on its management rights, must clearly define its mandate for clinical supervision.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
