Abstract

Abstract. Carbon (C) saturation theory suggests that soils have a limited capacity to stabilize organic C and that this capacity may be regulated by intrinsic soil properties such as clay concentration and mineralogy. While C saturation theory has advanced our ability to predict soil C stabilization, few biogeochemical ecosystem models have incorporated C saturation mechanisms. In biogeochemical models, C and nitrogen (N) cycling are tightly coupled, with C decomposition and respiration driving N mineralization. Thus, changing model structures from non-saturation to C saturation dynamics can change simulated N dynamics. In this study, we used C saturation models from the literature and of our own design to compare how different methods of modeling C saturation affected simulated N mineralization dynamics. Specifically, we tested (i) how modeling C saturation by regulating either the transfer efficiency (ε, g C retained g−1 C respired) or transfer rate (k) of C to stabilized pools affected N mineralization dynamics, (ii) how inclusion of an explicit microbial pool through which C and N must pass affected N mineralization dynamics, and (iii) whether using ε to implement C saturation in a model results in soil texture controls on N mineralization that are similar to those currently included in widely used non-saturating C and N models. Models were parameterized so that they rendered the same C balance. We found that when C saturation is modeled using ε, the critical C : N ratio for N mineralization from decomposing plant residues (rcr) increases as C saturation of a soil increases. When C saturation is modeled using k, however, rcr is not affected by the C saturation of a soil. Inclusion of an explicit microbial pool in the model structure was necessary to capture short-term N immobilization–mineralization turnover dynamics during decomposition of low N residues. Finally, modeling C saturation by regulating ε led to similar soil texture controls on N mineralization as a widely used non-saturating model, suggesting that C saturation may be a fundamental mechanism that can explain N mineralization patterns across soil texture gradients. These findings indicate that a coupled C and N model that includes saturation can (1) represent short-term N mineralization by including a microbial pool and (2) express the effects of texture on N turnover as an emergent property.

Highlights

  • Over the last two decades, the development of carbon (C) saturation theory has fundamentally changed our understanding of C storage in soils, and new biogeochemical models have been developed to include C saturation dynamics (Hassink and Whitmore, 1997; Kemanian et al, 2005; Stewart et al, 2007; Kemanian et al, 2011)

  • This model includes a microbial pool (Cm), a labile unprotected pool (Cun), and a saturating pool of protected C (Cs). We called this the abiotic saturation model because the saturating pool is directly linked to the labile pool and any transfers are abiotic sorption and desorption. We compared these three C saturation models to the Rothamsted C (RothC) model (Jenkinson, 1990), which is based on first-order kinetics and which results in a linear relationship between C input and steady-state C level

  • We revealed two important considerations for how C saturation models can be linked to N mineralization dynamics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the last two decades, the development of carbon (C) saturation theory has fundamentally changed our understanding of C storage in soils, and new biogeochemical models have been developed to include C saturation dynamics (Hassink and Whitmore, 1997; Kemanian et al, 2005; Stewart et al, 2007; Kemanian et al, 2011). Altering the structure of a C model to accommodate saturation dynamics is likely to affect the coupled N cycle, yet few attempts have been made to understand how C saturation affects N cycling (e.g., Castellano et al, 2012). To our knowledge, no study has addressed how the C saturation models proposed in the literature affect simulated N mineralization dynamics.

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.