Abstract

The purpose of this research is to propose a Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) implementation framework grounded in a literature review while categorizing practices adopted by firms’ and industries. Given the evolution of the SSCM field and emerging trends, we examine why and how companies implement SSCM practices within a country context. The research methods employed in this study include theory building from a review of the literature and synthesis of insights regarding the design of SSCM implementation frameworks using multiple cases in Taiwan. The review of the literature, content analysis, and findings provide new insights into designing an implementation model, and generalizable models for reactive, cooperative, and dynamic SSCM implementation. Practical implications include but are not limited to the generalization of implementation frameworks in supply chain management, and opportunities to improve global practices. Our development of the conceptual framework complements existing theory by offering new knowledge on SSCM implementation practices. This study can help guide research, practitioners, and policymakers in future sustainability and supply chain management initiatives.

Highlights

  • Sustainable development is an attempt to formulate a program integrating various levels of human action, which was often considered separately before, based on moral reflection regarding human responsibility for the environment

  • Some have extended the trend of integrated annual sustainability and financial reporting [3] to call for integrated bottom line (IBL) performance [4], while building on the impacts green supply chains have on performance [5]

  • The purpose of this study is to develop an sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) implementation framework grounded in a literature review and categorizing SSCM published empirical practices

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sustainable development is an attempt to formulate a program integrating various levels of human action, which was often considered separately before, based on moral reflection regarding human responsibility for the environment. Tuni et al [6] concluded that companies beyond the focal firm are responsible for up to 80% of overall supply chain emissions. They take this further with the example of Marks & Spencer estimating that the environmental impact of its supply chain is 90%, with only 10% attributed to the focal firm. Because of these emissions, environmental performance cannot be adequately addressed at a single company level anymore. The idea is to make business better, make voluntary commitments for the local community, the environment and reduce the occurrence of negative phenomena

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call