Implementing personalisation for people with mental health problems: A comparative case study of four local authorities in England

Abstract

BackgroundEnhancing choice and control for people using services is a mental health and social-care service priority in England. Personalisation is a new policy and practice for delivery of social-care services where eligible adults are allocated a personal budget to spend to meet their agreed support needs.AimsTo describe approaches to introducing personal budgets to people with severe and enduring mental health needs, and to identify facilitators or barriers encountered.MethodWithin four English local authority (LA) areas, purposively selected to provide maximum variation, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 58 participants from LAs, NHS trusts and third-sector organisations. An Interpretive Framework analysis considered within- and across-site insights.ResultsIssues arising from the implementation of personalisation for people with mental health needs are presented under two general themes: “responsibility and power” and “vision and leadership”. Key challenges identified were complexities of working across NHS and LAs, the importance of effective leadership and engagement with service user representatives.ConclusionsImplementing personal budgets in mental health requires effective engagement of health and social-care systems. Change processes need strong leadership, clear vision and personal commitment, with ownership by all key stakeholders, including front-line practitioners.