Abstract

Landscape services have been found to foster collaboration among actors in social-ecological transitions towards a more sustainable landscape. In this essay I propose that the contribution of landscape to human health could be particularly effective to play such a role. Health is important to most people in society, to business and government, and of economic and social value. Urban green space is widely known to have a positive impact on human health, but outside the urban landscape this effect is much less known. However, human health is underrepresented in frameworks of ecosystems services and applications of landscape services.I explore how health could be incorporated into landscape approaches beyond the urban fringe. For the application in landscape approaches, it is vital that the relationship between landscape and human health is expressed in parameters that are recognized as meaningful by the various actor groups. As a health specification, I propose the concept of positive health, because it is based on well-being and subjective perceptions of health. To characterize the physical assets of landscape that associate with health, perceived landscape naturalness seems a promising concept to explore further. I offer examples of studies illustrating the relationship between landscape naturalness and 5 dimensions of positive health. I conclude with suggesting research priorities to develop a knowledge base for integrating human health in collaborative landscape adaptation.

Highlights

  • Scientific engagement with ecosystem services has long been dominated by mapping, assessment and valuation studies (Plieninger, Dijks, Oteros-Rozas, & Bieling, 2013)

  • Concepts like collaborative landscape governance (Görg, 2007), adaptive collaborative governance (Primmer, Jokinen, & Blicharska, 2015), landscape stewardship (Chapin & Knapp, 2015), landscape approaches (Arts et al, 2017) and nature-based solutions (Frantzeskaki, 2019) refer to modes of governance in which mixed groups of local citizens, land owners and enterprises cooperate with governmental bodies to adapt landscapes that meet future demands and challenges

  • This term parallels the ecosystem service concept, but emphasizes the cultural landscape as the provider of benefits rather than the natural ecosystem, with landscape services resulting from the interaction of humans and nature

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Scientific engagement with ecosystem services has long been dominated by mapping, assessment and valuation studies (Plieninger, Dijks, Oteros-Rozas, & Bieling, 2013). Concepts like collaborative landscape governance (Görg, 2007), adaptive collaborative governance (Primmer, Jokinen, & Blicharska, 2015), landscape stewardship (Chapin & Knapp, 2015), landscape approaches (Arts et al, 2017) and nature-based solutions (Frantzeskaki, 2019) refer to modes of governance in which mixed groups of local citizens, land owners and enterprises cooperate with governmental bodies to adapt landscapes that meet future demands and challenges. These are often cultural landscapes, that have been changed to meet human needs and values. I close this essay by proposing research priorities on a way forward to integrate human health in landscape governance

Current position of health in ecosystem services frameworks
A health concept that connects to people
Identifying landscape features related to human health
Evidence for relationships between landscape naturalness and positive health
A way forward
Developing positive health as a landscape benefit
Findings
Dose-impact relationships
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call