Abstract
The computational performance of various implementations of a data envelopment analysis model are investigated. These include primal and dual versions of both single-stage (∊ represented as a small numerical magnitude) and two-stage (∊ not explicitly represented) approaches, It is found, contrary to widely held belief, that the implementation based on the primal DEA model is faster than that based on the dual model, which has many fewer constraints. Some reasons for this unexpected finding are suggested.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.