Abstract
Regulation-based processes for evaluating the performance of mental health agencies are gradually changing to focus on measuring the effectiveness of mental health services in obtaining the best possible outcomes. The decreased availability of resources for serving people with mental health problems has led to an emphasis on effectiveness, which is often expressed in terms of accountability. Thus, a singular reliance on compliance with practice standards has shifted to the need to be able to demonstrate that funds appropriated for mental health services are being used in ways that result in valued outcomes. In Colorado, this shift has led to the development of performance indicators that provide information reflecting stakeholder values about the performance outcomes of the mental health system. This article describes these performance indicators and presents the data that led to a decision to award monetary incentives to two community agencies. Potential benefits and pitfalls of Colorado's performance indicator process are also discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
