Abstract

BackgroundIn Central Norway a generic care pathway was developed in collaboration between general hospitals and primary care with the intention of implementing it into everyday practice. The care pathway targeted elderly patients who were in need of home care services after discharge from hospital. The aim of the present study was to investigate the implementation process of the care pathway by comparing the experiences of health care professionals and managers in home care services between the participating municipalities.MethodsThis was a qualitative comparative process evaluation using data from individual and focus group interviews. The Normalization Process Theory, which provides a framework for understanding how a new intervention becomes part of normal practice, was applied in our analysis.ResultsIn all of the municipalities there were expectations that the generic care pathway would improve care coordination and quality of follow-up, but a substantial amount of work was needed to make the regular home care staff understand how to use the care pathway. Other factors of importance for successful implementation were involvement of the executive municipal management, strong managerial focus on creating engagement and commitment among all professional groups, practical facilitation of work processes, and a stable organisation without major competing priorities. At the end of the project period, the pathway was integrated in daily practice in two of the six municipalities. In these municipalities the care pathway was found to have the potential of structuring the provision of home care services and collaboration with the GPs, and serving as a management tool to effect change and improve knowledge and skills.ConclusionThe generic care pathway for elderly patients has a potential of improving follow-up in primary care by meeting professional and managerial needs for improved quality of care, as well as more efficient organisation of home care services. However, implementation of this complex intervention in full-time running organisations was demanding and required comprehensive and prolonged efforts in all levels of the organisation. Studies on implementation of such complex interventions should therefore have a long follow-up time to identify whether the intervention becomes integrated into everyday practice.

Highlights

  • In Central Norway a generic care pathway was developed in collaboration between general hospitals and primary care with the intention of implementing it into everyday practice

  • Makes sense As home care professionals in all participating municipalities had been involved in development of Patient trajectory for home–dwelling elders (PaTH) according to their own perceived needs for improvements, informants from all municipalities expected PaTH to be useful; i.e. to improve collaboration with General practitioner (GP) and hospitals and the quality of service delivery within the home care services

  • The implementation of PaTH was found to be demanding and the amount of work needed for successful implementation generally underrated; the two municipalities that experienced major competing priorities during the implementation period ended up discontinuing PaTH despite initial enthusiasm and high expectations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In Central Norway a generic care pathway was developed in collaboration between general hospitals and primary care with the intention of implementing it into everyday practice. Several strategies, including a range of interventions, have been developed to improve continuity of care across care levels; e.g. individualised discharge planning [4], liaison nurses and discharge coordinators [5], enhanced multidisciplinary team work [6], transitional and intermediate care units [7], integrated care pathways [8] and integrated medical and social care [9]. These are complex interventions including multiple components and personnel, often across different organisations and care levels. PaTH was the result of a bottom-up process in which home care professionals, general practitioners, patient organisations, and hospital employees (nurses and physicians) defined challenges and proposed solutions in transitional care and follow-up [2]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call