Abstract

Cross-case analyses of factors that influence the process and implementation quality of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S. based on seven cases were carried out. Systematic and integrative analyses revealed several conclusions. First, several factors related to policy, people, program, process, and place (5 “P”s) were conducive to the successful implementation of the Tier 1 Program in the schools. Second, there were obstacles and difficulties with reference to the 5 “P”s that impeded the quality of implementation. Third, policy support and people (especially commitment and passion of the principals, senior school administrators, and program implementers) are two main groups of factors that influence the quality of program implementation. Fourth, although there were different arrangements for program implementation, incorporation of the Tier 1 Program into the formal curriculum was a sound and viable strategy. Fifth, implementation of the Tier 1 Program in schools that admitted students with high or low academic achievement was viable. Sixth, the program was generally perceived positively by the program participants and implementers. Finally, the program implementers perceived the program to be beneficial to the program participants.

Highlights

  • Characteristics of the SchoolLocation North Point Tokuawan Shatin Kowloon Tong Sheung Shui Tuen Mun Sex composition CoedNo of S1 students119

  • Policy support and people were two main groups of factors that influenced the quality of program implementation

  • Many positive youth development programs have been developed in the Western context, there are still many unanswered questions concerning factors that influence the implementation quality of such programs[5]

Read more

Summary

Participants

Among 207 schools that joined the Project P.A.T.H.S. (Secondary 1 Curriculum) in the Full Implementation Phase, seven schools were invited to participate in the case study. These schools shared some similarities, there were unique features in each case. In the first case (School A) reported by Shek and Sun, the 20-h Tier 1 Program was covered in the class teacher’s periods, Life Education subject, and project-based learning. In the second case (School B) reported by Shek, Chak, and Chan, the Tier 1 Program (20 h) was wholly incorporated into the Life Education subject of the formal curriculum. In the final case (School G) reported by Sun, Shek, and Siu, macro school and classroom attributes conducive to program success were examined In this case, the Tier 1 Program (10 h) was wholly incorporated into the Moral Education subject of the formal curriculum

Background
Procedures
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call