Abstract

BackgroundCollaborative-care management is an evidence-based practice for improving depression outcomes in primary care. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has mandated the implementation of collaborative-care management in its satellite clinics, known as Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs). However, the organizational characteristics of CBOCs present added challenges to implementation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) as a strategy to facilitate the adoption of collaborative-care management in CBOCs.MethodsThis nonrandomized, small-scale, multisite evaluation of EBQI was conducted at three VA Medical Centers and 11 of their affiliated CBOCs. The Plan phase of the EBQI process involved the localized tailoring of the collaborative-care management program to each CBOC. Researchers ensured that the adaptations were evidence based. Clinical and administrative staff were responsible for adapting the collaborative-care management program for local needs, priorities, preferences and resources. Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were used to refine the program over time. The evaluation was based on the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) Framework and used data from multiple sources: administrative records, web-based decision-support systems, surveys, and key-informant interviews.ResultsAdoption: 69.0% (58/84) of primary care providers referred patients to the program. Reach: 9.0% (298/3,296) of primary care patients diagnosed with depression who were not already receiving specialty care were enrolled in the program. Fidelity: During baseline care manager encounters, education/activation was provided to 100% (298/298) of patients, barriers were assessed and addressed for 100% (298/298) of patients, and depression severity was monitored for 100% (298/298) of patients. Less than half (42.5%, 681/1603) of follow-up encounters during the acute stage were completed within the timeframe specified. During the acute phase of treatment for all trials, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) symptom-monitoring tool was used at 100% (681/681) of completed follow-up encounters, and self-management goals were discussed during 15.3% (104/681) of completed follow-up encounters. During the acute phase of treatment for pharmacotherapy and combination trials, medication adherence was assessed at 99.1% (575/580) of completed follow-up encounters, and side effects were assessed at 92.4% (536/580) of completed follow-up encounters. During the acute phase of treatment for psychotherapy and combination trials, counseling session adherence was assessed at 83.3% (239/287) of completed follow-up encounters. Effectiveness: 18.8% (56/298) of enrolled patients remitted (symptom free) and another 22.1% (66/298) responded to treatment (50% reduction in symptom severity). Maintenance: 91.9% (10/11) of the CBOCs chose to sustain the program after research funds were withdrawn.ConclusionsProvider adoption was good, although reach into the target population was relatively low. Fidelity and maintenance were excellent, and clinical outcomes were comparable to those in randomized controlled trials. Despite the organizational barriers, these findings suggest that EBQI is an effective facilitation strategy for CBOCs.Trial registrationClinical trial # NCT00317018.

Highlights

  • Collaborative-care management (CCM) is an evidencebased practice that involves a multidisciplinary depression care team providing guideline-concordant depression treatment in the primary care setting

  • Fidelity and maintenance were excellent, and clinical outcomes were comparable to those in randomized controlled trials. These findings suggest that evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) is an effective facilitation strategy for Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs)

  • The Veterans Affairs (VA) has encouraged the implementation of CCM in its Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs), where 64% of veterans receive their care [12], and mandated implementation in those categorized as large (5,000-10,000 patients) and very large (> 10,000 patients)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Collaborative-care management (CCM) is an evidencebased practice that involves a multidisciplinary depression care team (e.g., primary care providers, nurse care managers, pharmacists, psychologists, psychiatrists) providing guideline-concordant depression treatment in the primary care setting. The VA has encouraged the implementation of CCM in its Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs), where 64% of veterans receive their care [12], and mandated implementation in those categorized as large (5,000-10,000 patients) and very large (> 10,000 patients). Veterans treated in CBOCs have significantly fewer mental health visits than do veterans treated at VAMCs [14]. Veterans treated in contract CBOCs have significantly fewer mental health visits than do veterans treated in VA-staffed (i.e., owned and operated) CBOCs [15]. While CCM could potentially address this disparity, there are numerous barriers to implementing a complex clinical program like CCM in small contract CBOCs. Collaborative-care management is an evidence-based practice for improving depression outcomes in primary care. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has mandated the implementation of collaborative-care management in its satellite clinics, known as Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) as a strategy to facilitate the adoption of collaborative-care management in CBOCs

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.