Implementation of xSPECT, xSPECT bone and Broadquant from literature, clinical survey and innovative phantom study with task-based image quality assessment

Abstract

ObjectiveFrom patient and phantom studies, we aimed to highlight an original implementation process and share a two-years experience clinical feedback on xSPECT (xS), xSPECT Bone (xB) and Broadquant quantification (Siemens) for 99mTc-bone and 177Lu-NET (neuroendocrine tumors) imaging. MethodsFirstly, we checked the relevance of implemented protocols and Broadquant module on the basis of literature and with a homogeneous phantom study respectively. Then, we described xS and xB behaviours with reconstruction parameters (10i-0mm to 40i-20mm) and optimized the protocols through a blinded survey (7 physicians). Finally, the preferred 99mTc-bone reconstruction was assessed through an IEC NEMA phantom including liquid bone spheres. Conventional SNR, CNR, spatial resolution, Q.%error, and recovery curves; and innovative NPS, TTF and detectability score d’ were performed (ImQuest software). We also sought to review the adoption of these tools in clinical routine and showed the potential of quantitative xB in the context of theranostics (Xofigo®). ResultsWe showed the need of optimization of implemented reconstruction algorithms and pointed out a decay correction particularity with Broadquant. Preferred parameters were 1s-25i-8mm and 1s-25i-5mm for xS/xB-bone and xS-NET imaging respectively. The phantom study highlighted the different image quality especially for the enhanced spatial resolution xB algorithm (1/TTF10%=2.1 mm) and showed F3D and xB shared the best performances in terms of image quality and quantification. xS was generally less efficient. ConclusionsQualitative F3D still remains the clinical standard, xB and Broadquant offer challenging perspectives in theranostics. We introduced the potential of innovative metrics for image quality analysis and showed how CT tools should be adapted to fit nuclear medicine imaging.