Abstract

In July 2018, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) implemented a mandatory smoke-free rule in public housing. This study assessed administrator and resident perceptions of rule implementation during its initial year in the District of Columbia Housing Authority (DCHA). Assessment included nine focus groups (n = 69) with residents and in-depth interviews with administrators (n = 7) and residents (n = 26) from 14 DCHA communities (family = 7 and senior/disabled = 7). Semi-structured discussion guides based on the multi-level socio-ecological framework captured dialogue that was recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded inductively. Emerging major themes for each socio-ecological framework level included: (1) Individual: the rule was supported due to perceived health benefits, with stronger support among non-smokers; (2) Interpersonal: limiting secondhand smoke exposure was perceived as a positive for vulnerable residents; (3) Organizational: communication, signage, and cessation support was perceived as a need; (4) Community: residents perceived mobility, disability, weather, and safety-related issues as barriers; and (5) Public Policy: lease amendments were perceived as enablers of rule implementation but expressed confusion about violations and enforcement. A majority of administrators and residents reported favorable implications of the mandated HUD rule. The novel application of a socio-ecological framework, however, detected implementation nuances that required improvements on multiple levels, including more signage, cessation support, clarification of enforcement roles, and addressing safety concerns.

Highlights

  • Smoke-free policies in public spaces show success in reducing secondhand smoke exposure [1], tobacco use, and a host of negative tobacco-related health outcomes [2]

  • The purpose of this study is to examine administrator and resident perceptions on multiple dimensions of the Department of Housing and Urban Development mandated smoke-free rule during its initial year of implementation in District of Columbia Housing Authority multi-unit housing communities

  • This study presents results from in-depth interviews and focus groups with administrators and residents revealing multiple factors at different levels of the socio-ecological framework that influences perceptions and uptake of the non-smoking rule in the District of Columbia Housing Authority public housing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Smoke-free policies in public spaces (i.e., workplaces, restaurants, and bars) show success in reducing secondhand smoke exposure [1], tobacco use, and a host of negative tobacco-related health outcomes [2]. Unlike public spaces, smoking in private homes is largely unregulated because of ethical concerns about regulating individuals’ private behaviors. Residents in multi-unit housing are susceptible to involuntary.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.