Abstract

The author analyzes the policy of non-recognition implemented by Georgia, Azerbaijan and Moldova in relation to the separatist con fl ict territories. The policy of non-recognition designates both the refusal to recognize de facto existing political entities, and other measures that accompany it and are associated with the need to build relations with self-proclaimed states. Comparative analysis of the three depicted models shows that, despite the permanent essence of the non- recognition policy, there are signi fi cant di ff erences in its practical implementation. Although the policy of non-recognition does not bring the parent states closer to resolving the con fl ict, in its various manifestations it can both contribute to the gradual disappearance of enmity and intensify existing contradictions. Factors that in fl uence non-recognition politics include political narratives surrounding the con fl ict, dominant state-building patterns, patron state policies, perceived identity threats, experience of historical trauma and war.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call