Abstract

Abstract. Worldwide expansion of agriculture is impacting the earth's climate by altering carbon, water, and energy fluxes, but the climate in turn is impacting crop production. To study this two-way interaction and its impact on seasonal dynamics of carbon, water, and energy fluxes, we implemented dynamic crop growth processes into a land surface model, the Integrated Science Assessment Model (ISAM). In particular, we implemented crop-specific phenology schemes and dynamic carbon allocation schemes. These schemes account for light, water, and nutrient stresses while allocating the assimilated carbon to leaf, root, stem, and grain pools. The dynamic vegetation structure simulation better captured the seasonal variability in leaf area index (LAI), canopy height, and root depth. We further implemented dynamic root distribution processes in soil layers, which better simulated the root response of soil water uptake and transpiration. Observational data for LAI, above- and belowground biomass, and carbon, water, and energy fluxes were compiled from two AmeriFlux sites, Mead, NE, and Bondville, IL, USA, to calibrate and evaluate the model performance. For the purposes of calibration and evaluation, we use a corn–soybean (C4–C3) rotation system over the period 2001–2004. The calibrated model was able to capture the diurnal and seasonal patterns of carbon assimilation and water and energy fluxes for the corn–soybean rotation system at these two sites. Specifically, the calculated gross primary production (GPP), net radiation fluxes at the top of the canopy, and latent heat fluxes compared well with observations. The largest bias in model results was in sensible heat flux (SH) for corn and soybean at both sites. The dynamic crop growth simulation better captured the seasonal variability in carbon and energy fluxes relative to the static simulation implemented in the original version of ISAM. Especially, with dynamic carbon allocation and root distribution processes, the model's simulated GPP and latent heat flux (LH) were in much better agreement with observational data than for the static root distribution simulation. Modeled latent heat based on dynamic growth processes increased by 12–27% during the growing season at both sites, leading to an improvement in modeled GPP by 13–61% compared to the estimates based on the original version of the ISAM.

Highlights

  • Increasing global food demand accelerates deforestation in areas suitable for modern agriculture

  • The coupled model was able to capture the seasonal change in leaf area index (LAI) for corn, and the results demonstrate its importance for the calculation of the surface fluxes of heat, moisture, and momentum

  • These figures suggest that the calibrated model is able to simulate dynamic phenology development, carbon allocation, LAI and canopy height growth processes over multiyear growing seasons at the Mead, NE, site

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Increasing global food demand accelerates deforestation in areas suitable for modern agriculture. While we use a similar carbon assimilation, energy, and hydrological modeling approach, we implement new algorithms to simulate the following processes: (i) crop growth and biomass allocation in five phenology stages, distributing assimilated carbon among above- and belowground parts depending upon both accumulated heat and resource availability, such as light, water, and nutrients (e.g., nitrogen); (ii) development of vegetation structure (LAI, canopy height, and root depth) calculation based on accumulated carbon mass in leaf, stem, and root pools; (iii) vertical and horizontal root growth in soil layers in response to available soil moisture; and (iv) different abscission rates for fresh and old dead leaves. Unlike crop simulation schemes in other land surface models discussed above, the dynamic crop growth processes implemented in the extended ISAM account for the coupling between carbon biomass dynamics of leaf, stem, root, and grain and vegetation structure (LAI, canopy height and root depth and distribution), as well as environmental factors’ (temperature, water, light, nutrients) variability. Following the implementation of the new processes, the model parameters were calibrated, and model performance was evaluated using observational data (LAI, biomass, and carbon, water, and energy fluxes) from two AmeriFlux sites (Mead, NE, and Bondville, IL) under a corn–soybean rotation system

Model description
Implementation of dynamic crop growth processes in the ISAM
Phenology development
Carbon allocation
Description of the site data
ISAM calibration and evaluation
Model experiments
Statistical analysis
Best fit model results for the calibration site
ISAM results at the evaluation site
Biases in the model’s estimated carbon and energy fluxes
The effects of different dynamic processes on modeled results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call